More tedious than I expected, and very British in its sensibility.
While reading, I found it hard to believe that this novel became a global bestseller? but I would still urge you not to abandon it halfway through.It’s that kind of novel.
＊＊Support with a like↓＊＊
- The Overwhelming Narrative Created by the Lack of Compelling Characters
- The Signature Work of a Nobel Laureate
- Few Truly Compelling Characters
- The Overwhelming Loneliness and Hope of Humanity
- A Story of Emotional Power with Astonishing Structural Precision
- Strategy and Self-Awareness
- The Brightness of Norfolk
- A Final Reservation
The Overwhelming Narrative Created by the Lack of Compelling Characters
Cathy H., an excellent “carer,” looks after people known as “donors.” Her childhood friends Tommy and Ruth?who grew up with her at the institution called Hailsham?are donors as well. Cathy reflects on the strange days they spent at the facility: classes that emphasized arts and crafts, weekly health checks, and the awkward attitudes of the teachers known as “guardians.” As her memories unfold, they gradually reveal the cruel truth behind Hailsham.
From the description of the Hayakawa epi Bunko edition
I have always had a dull impression of Kazuo Ishiguro ever since I read The Remains of the Day in my teens. His style strikes me as polished and refined, but it has never aligned with my personal literary tastes. I can recognize the contemporary commercial appeal and ambition in his work, yet he is not a writer I particularly like.
That said, the aftertaste of this novel is undeniably genuine. Confronted with the overwhelming emotional impact it leaves behind, I can no longer doubt the claim that it is “the masterpiece of a Booker Prize?winning author that will shake the soul of every reader.”
Reading it nearly twenty years after its publication, I find myself trembling like this?something that feels a little embarrassing, yet at the same time filled with the possibilities and pleasures of literary reading. If anyone, like me until just recently, has not yet read it, I strongly recommend giving it a try.
I may not care for the author, but this book is extraordinary. Precisely because of that distance, I believe my evaluation carries a certain objectivity.
The Signature Work of a Nobel Laureate
The theme that it is more important how one lives than what one is is portrayed with particular charm in the episode at Norfolk?the “lost corner”?where Cathy and Tommy search for lost things from their past. The openness and richness of that scene make the idea deeply compelling.
This novel proceeds by gradually introducing a series of mysterious terms. Because the book is so famous, many readers probably begin it already knowing more than just the basic premise, yet the narrative still reveals and withholds information with great care.
Kazuo Ishiguro is a writer of formal literary craft who skillfully manipulates perspective and perception, and here again the story unfolds through the protagonist’s first-person recollection. Beyond the author’s technique of withholding information, Cathy herself only gradually learns fragments of the truth throughout her childhood?often confused by the guardians’ own piecemeal explanations. As a result, the narrative is structured through a double layer of mystery and a shifting sense of time.
The creative confusion that arises from this structure can feel almost like intoxication. It may reflect Cathy’s own bewilderment?her inability, no matter how many times she revisits the past, to settle into acceptance, her lingering dissatisfaction and emotional response to an underlying injustice. In the end, she never fully reconciles herself with her birth, her upbringing, or the fate imposed upon her life.
One could read the novel as suggesting that anyone placed in such circumstances would remain unsettled. Yet the motif can also be extended beyond Cathy alone?to all of humanity.
If so, what exactly is the nature of the unease that begins to stir in our own hearts?
Few Truly Compelling Characters
One of the difficulties of this novel is that it contains very few compelling characters. Cathy, the narrator herself, remains indistinct even after finishing the book?her personality neither sharply defined nor particularly attractive. In fact, almost everyone in the novel seems stripped of individuality. They appear less as distinct characters than as interchangeable figures within a crowd.
The boarding-school life at Hailsham could have been depicted as something vivid and appealing: friendships among many students, relationships with teachers and guardians, the emotional intensity of youth. Yet Ishiguro largely confines himself to an external perspective, an elevated and distant viewpoint. The result is that the narrative rarely descends into emotional immediacy. There is remarkably little warmth.
If this thinness of characterization?lacking both density and complexity?is characteristic of Ishiguro as a writer, then Klara and the Sun, with its allegorical world and its childlike narrator of limited perspective, cleverly conceals that weakness. In fact, while reading this novel I once again found myself convinced that Klara and the Sun represents the peak of Ishiguro’s creative achievement: a work that transforms his limitations into strengths.
For that reason, I initially thought that while Never Let Me Go might be considered his masterpiece commercially, Ishiguro as a writer had actually grown and developed further in his later work. Yet after finishing the novel I had to reconsider. My speculation was simply wrong. This book provides a powerful answer to the question of why such an apparently dull novel receives such overwhelming praise.
The Overwhelming Loneliness and Hope of Humanity
The title Never Let Me Go refers to a song cherished by the protagonist.
Never let me go, baby, baby…
In Cathy’s interpretation, the “baby” in the lyrics refers not to a lover but to an infant. She herself later acknowledges that this reading is probably mistaken. Yet the misreading reveals something essential about her life. The characters in this novel have no parents and cannot have children of their own. They live under the weight of an overwhelming loneliness.
They are born without value, raised without meaning, and deceived by the adults they trusted. Cathy carries within herself this absolute void, and it becomes one of the central motifs of the novel.
Even the sudden sexual impulses she experiences?feelings she once believed unique to herself?seem connected to a deeper instinct: the desire to bear a child, to belong with someone, to fill the void of loneliness and affirm the value of life itself. Later, Ruth confesses similar feelings, suggesting that this is not merely Cathy’s private experience but a shared condition among them.
To overlay absolute loneliness with sexual desire alone feels deeply biological. As managed beings?almost like domesticated animals?whose knowledge of the world is limited to the narrow span of their own lives, this is perhaps the only way they can experience and articulate such emotions.
A Story of Emotional Power with Astonishing Structural Precision
The achievement of this novel lies in its technical perfection: the flawless alignment of narrative voice, conceptual device, and thematic intention.
One may criticize the trimming of the narrative or the thinness of its characters. Yet when looking back, everything seems strangely appropriate. Even the unremarkable friends and the uninspiring educational institution?none of them particularly attractive?become precious to Cathy as memories she does not want to let go of. They are parts of herself that she does not wish to lose.
When I realized this creative accomplishment, I was deeply moved.
Personally, I found 400 of the novel’s 439 pages boring. For a novel published in the 2000s, its conception of storytelling feels almost archaic. Yet the work begins precisely with that bold decision: to write most of the book in an intentionally dull manner.
There are no particularly captivating characters and little dramatic plot. Instead, Ishiguro performs an astonishing technical feat?granting profound meaning to an otherwise mundane school life through the overwhelming power of its theme.
The result is a novel that achieves something remarkable through the alignment of theme, idea, and technique. And the same could be said of Klara and the Sun, which resolves its allegorical ambitions through narrative voice while drawing on Ishiguro’s strengths in depicting childhood.
In both cases, one cannot help but admire the writer’s strategic self-awareness. Ishiguro clearly understands his own literary strengths and limitations and constructs his works accordingly. In that sense, these novels are almost perfect examples of how a perfect novel may exist even if no perfect novelist does.
It is an achievement that commands respect.
Strategy and Self-Awareness
Ishiguro’s strategy for establishing himself as a writer worth reading has been remarkably effective. With only a handful of works he emerged onto the literary stage, won major international prizes, and secured his place in world literature.
Born in Japan but raised in Britain from a young age, he began his career with two novels set in Japan and Nagasaki. Then, with his third novel, he turned decisively toward Britain and won the Booker Prize.
In other words, he has been extraordinarily adept at navigating the literary world. What enables this success is his combination of thematic selection and technical skill.
Indeed, Never Let Me Go demonstrates this vividly. Ishiguro seems fully aware of both his own lightness and his remarkable technical ability. He possesses a clear, objective intelligence about his own craft.
From creating literary value to securing a global reputation, his methods are strikingly efficient. His technique is precise and effective.
Yet perhaps this efficiency reveals something else. Writing about certain subjects can be messy and complicated. If a writer can generate a rich narrative purely from motifs and ideas, then perhaps the complexity of individual human personalities becomes unnecessary.
It may be that Ishiguro is simply not interested in the messy, inefficient intelligence that is individual human character. If he cannot make such characters compelling, then perhaps he chooses not to write them at all. And that is a legitimate artistic choice. A writer should write only what they truly wish to write.
The Brightness of Norfolk
The episode in Norfolk?the “lost corner”?remains symbolic and strangely bright. It is the brightness that exists before everything is fully understood.
Perhaps that brightness itself is life.
Perhaps it is the feeling: I will not let go of my life.
What makes me myself?
In Klara and the Sun, Ishiguro answers that question through love?through the presence of those who care for someone. But that answer cannot fully save Cathy.
Still, there remains one small consolation: memory. The memories of where she was born and raised, and the memories of who she was in that place, continue to exist as long as she lives.
Cathy did not choose her profession freely, and her work?caring for donors until the end of their lives?is emotionally heavy. Yet throughout the novel she never volunteers to become a donor herself. As long as she is allowed to remain a carer, she continues to live that way.
She never relinquishes the freedom to live.
I found a great hope in that fact.
Yet the novel itself places its emphasis overwhelmingly on loneliness. And artistically, that is probably the correct choice. Emotionally as well, it is undeniably powerful for readers.
But one question remains: what value does that loneliness hold?
A Final Reservation
Ishiguro possesses the intelligence and skill to build an entire novel around a single idea. Yet true engagement with subject matter and reality also requires passion and depth.
If the novel ultimately borrows elements from science fiction only to produce a single emotional effect?loneliness?then the work risks feeling somewhat immature.
If this were a 200-page novella, I would have no complaints. But to invest more than 400 pages only to arrive at loneliness and tenderness feels excessive.
In a sense, the novel can be read as little more than the confession of a single woman’s unwavering devotion. Once one recognizes the narrowness of that perspective, it becomes difficult?at least for me?to praise this long novel without reservation as a masterpiece.
Perhaps a novella could never have become a “representative work.” For that reason the story had to be a novel. Yet if so, more could have been written.
My suspicion is simply that Ishiguro cannot write that “more.”
Still, as I have repeated throughout this review: a writer should write only what they truly wish to write. And readers ultimately support that freedom.
＊＊Support with a like↓＊＊
コメント